0 50jahre 1 Wind 2 Morgen 3 Sim 4 Und da 5 Komplexe 6 Lügen 7 Deppen 8 Rand 9 Links 10_Schwer 11_Gast

It’s actually hard to deal with certain political parties and form a clear opinion. On the one hand, there are journalists who, in a three-way conversation with a party leader, gang up on him, while the party representative, unlike “the others,” remains calm. Ultimately, what sticks with me is that he came across better than the others.

Then there are the posters of a party that tell the story of a cheerful youth with sophistication and humor. What can you really say against a girl in traditional dress who is laughing happily? There is a kind of life again that I wish for young people. And I’m sure of this: it resonates.

In some areas, nearly 50% of voters now believe this party should be given leadership responsibility. The question, therefore, is not what should be done against this party, or whether it should be banned. The question is: what can we change so that we can win over these 50% and—yes—integrate them. You can’t ignore half the population, as is still the case. The “others” are doing a lot wrong. It’s not for nothing that certain groups go by the alias “identitarian.” They stand for something—you have to give them that. What do the others stand for, what do “we” stand for?

It seems simple when terms like “spearhead” are used. Fortunately, the nationalistic militarism implicit in such language is still rejected by large segments of the population. But what stands out is that it’s always the same excerpts from speeches that are shown by the public broadcasters. I’d like to see it, but that won’t work. It’s also interesting how one of the leaders can switch, during speeches, from a face that expresses disgust and arrogance toward others to a mischievous smile when this person considers a comment from the audience to be interesting. At that moment, you ask yourself: Is that still the same person? And you realize once again that there is a highly intelligent woman standing on the podium who is consciously controlling everything. And apparently, the disgust shown toward others elicits support from her own people.

Well, I’m curious to see how things will unfold. Something is in motion. Fear is not what I feel. But I do fear that we will see more and more states turning inward, and humanity across the globe will fall by the wayside. No one is entitled to more resources than others simply because of where they were born.

Here and there, I can see trends that were thought to be dead but might point us back on the right path. I consider a “renewed focus on workers” to be the right signal. Keep it up! What, on the other hand, is complete nonsense is getting upset that, in isolated cases, jobs are given to family members when one is in a position to do so. I would do the same, wouldn’t you? An even bigger nonsense is getting upset about a “work-life balance.” It would do you good too, Mr. Chancellor. I fear your family shares my view on this. But a former BlackRock junkie might not be in a position to do so.